Tag Archive | women’s history

Martha Matilda Harper and the Invention of the Franchise

A couple of weeks ago, when I was doing research about 19th century hairstyles, I stumbled across the remarkable story of Martha Matilda Harper. Never heard of her? Neither had I, but she is an amazing woman! I had to share. This is a remarkable 19th century success story about courage, perseverance, and sheer, stubborn determination to raise the status of women and to enable them to stand on their own.

Martha Matilda Harper, courtesy of Wikicommons

Martha Matilda Harper, courtesy of Wikicommons

Martha Matilda Harper was born to a working class family in Oakville, Ontario in 1857. Not exactly the best circumstances to be born into if you were a woman. At the age of seven, her father sent her away to work as a domestic servant in the household of a relative. Martha Matilda (not sure if that’s what she was called, but I like the sound of it, sooo…) ended up working in service for 25 years.

Now, if this had been the story of any other young woman of humble origin in the mid-19th century, that would be it. Social climbing wasn’t exactly easy in this world. It was a time when a woman’s worth was determined by the men in her life, her father or her husband. Working class women didn’t just set out on their own to create a better life for themselves. And they certainly didn’t start businesses, right? Continue reading

The Beauty and Evolution of 19th Century Hairstyles

Yet another insult fate has added to injury in the story of how I should have been born 125 years before I was, thus living out the plumb of my days in the late Victorian era, is the fact that I have 19th century hair. Yes, I do. Everything about my hair, from the volume to the texture to the amount of it lends itself to 19th century hairstyles. See?

My hair as it was styled for my brother's wedding back in December

My hair as it was styled for my brother’s wedding back in December

But what exactly is 19th century hair, and why would I want it anyhow? Continue reading

Retail Therapy 1800s Style

Yes, I’m guilty. I’ve been known to go out and buy myself something pretty when I’m feeling down. Haven’t we all? Ah! Retail therapy! It’s a modern curse, right?

Not necessarily.

Harrods of London Wikicommons - Carl Frieder Kathe

Harrods of London
Wikicommons – Carl Frieder Kathe

We think of zipping out and buying something ready-made at a mall or department store as a relatively modern invention. Maybe the practice was around in the 1950s, right? But we’re sure it’s a harbinger of the modern age. After all, in the past everyone had their clothes ready-made and bought local goods from specialized stores – butcher, baker, tailor, haberdashers. Shopping as we know it is relatively new.

Or is it?

In fact, one of the world’s first department stores, Bennett’s of Irongate in Derby, England, was opened in 1734. What? 1734? A department store? Yes. Bennett’s began as modest ironmongers, but they soon expanded and added different goods: agricultural supplies, guns and silver goods, “oils and colours”. When it was bought out in the 1860s by George Bennett (who gave the existing store his name) the amount and type of goods was expanded again to include sporting equipment and whatever else old George felt like selling. It was a 19th century one-stop shopping treat. And guess what? It’s still open in the same location today.

Of course, Bennett’s wasn’t the only department store to open in the 19th century. Far from it. The 1820s and 30s saw a boom of department store openings, from Harrods to Kendals to Bainbridge’s. And that’s just in the UK. By the 1850s, Macy’s was founded, and in the 1870s in Philadelphia, Wannamaker’s (where my mom used to take me shopping when I was a kid). So many of the major anchor stores in malls actually had their beginnings in the 19th century that we tend to forget that shopping has been around since our grandparent’s grandparents were kids.

But what were these stores? What did department stores sell? And how was that different from the way things had been before they existed?

Ah, the mechanization of production! Wikicommons - Bain Collection

Ah, the mechanization of production!
Wikicommons – Bain Collection

The easy answer is that before department stores, consumers had to shop at many different, smaller stores to get all of the goods they needed. If they were shopping at all. Many of the items that filled the homes and lives of pre-Industrial people were hand-made at home or treasured heirloom tools passed down through families. Life was more rural and centralized and in general people shared what they had. All that changed with the upheaval brought by Industrialization. Suddenly more goods were available to a wider area of people thanks to mechanization, and vast amounts of people were displaced from the country to cities. With that upheaval came the need to start over, including revisiting material needs.

Okay, that’s a huge, sweeping generalization of a complex time in our history. The point is, people’s needs changed as the means of production changed. But what has always tickled my curiosity in the history of retail is the question of when clothing went from being something we made individually for ourselves or had a tailor construct for us to something we bought ready to wear at a store.

The answer is, of course, closely tied to the development of the department store.

Back in the day – meaning all the way from the Middle Ages up to the 19th century – cloth intended for clothing was distributed and sold by drapers. Drapers sold cloth to individuals and tailors. It was a successful draper, Charles Henry Harrod, who began his business in 1825 in London and worked to expand it over the next few decades to sell groceries, then home and luxury goods and the like to morph into what we now know as Harrod’s department store. So the connection between clothing and department stores has existed from day one.

This lovely dress would have been literally tailor-made. Wikicommons

This lovely dress would have been literally tailor-made.
Wikicommons

As for the arrival of ready-to-wear fashion, that actually did come much later and in gradual steps. With the development of mass production of textiles, fabric became less expensive. It was possible to buy pre-made clothing as early as the early 1800s, but sizes weren’t standardized and most items didn’t fit particularly well. The exceptions were in coats and outerwear and underwear. Those items were more commonly found pre-made. For the most part, though, the women of the family sewed everyone’s clothes.

The first inklings of a shift away from this came with the wider availability of both sewing machines and standardized patterns. The introduction of graded pattern paper in 1864 by Ebenezer Butterick, with the help of his wife, of course, meant that patterns could be made more quickly and cost-effectively and distributed more easily. The founding of Sears and Roebuck and the evolution of their catalog in the 1890s helped this process along.

Meanwhile, the manufacture of ready-made clothing was developing. The “sweating” system, by which merchants contracted work out to groups of seamstresses, often working in poor conditions, reached a pitch of development in the 1880s. Men’s clothing began to be mass-produced in this way in the 1860s with women’s clothing following behind in the late 1880s and 90s. By the early twentieth century the balance of hand-made to factory made clothing was beginning to shift. It wasn’t until the late 1920s and 30s, though, that factory-made clothing became more the norm than hand-made. And by then all sorts of issues of working conditions and worker’s rights blossomed with it.

The moral of the story is, if you were feeling down a hundred or a hundred and fifty years ago and wanted to cheer yourself up with some retail therapy, it would have been pretty easy to get out there and impulse buy. Although if you were an American anywhere other than the heart of a big city in the 1890s into the early 20th century, you would have been just as likely to flip through the Sears catalog to order what your heart desired. The point being, consumerism and shopping have been around about as long as the Industrial Revolution, far longer than most people think.

Great Romances – Thaddeus and Mrs. Stevens

Okay, I’m writing this before the Oscars, even though it’s going to post the day after, and while I don’t expect Lincoln to win, it’s one of the Best Picture nominated films that I’ve actually seen. (Incidentally, why do they nominate so many films for Best Picture these days? I miss the days when there were just 5 nominees) Anyhow, if you’re like me, a hopeless romantic and history buff, of course the question you were left with at the end of the movie was “Was Thaddeus Stevens really in a relationship with his African American housekeeper?”

And also if you’re like me, you went out and did the research. Here’s what I learned….

Yes. Yes he was.

public domain

public domain

Thaddeus Stevens was an interesting guy. He was born in Vermont in 1792 and was one of four boys. His father was a shoemaker … when he wasn’t drunk and running out on the family. His father died when Thaddeus was young, so essentially he was raised by a single mother in the very early 1800s. All indications are that he worked hard, had a lot of responsibility from an early age, and grew up in poverty. He did attend Dartmouth College and later the University of Vermont, graduating in 1814 and moving to York, Pennsylvania. Yay Pennsylvania! He taught school there until he passed the bar. He then set up a law practice, first in Gettysburg and later in Lancaster. He never married. Probably because….

Lydia Hamilton Smith was born in 1815 to a free African American mother and Irish father. She married Jacob Smith, a free African American, and had two sons with him. When he passed away in 1852 she and her sons moved to Gettysburg, where she took a job as Thaddeus’s housekeeper.

Now, of course with any sort of personal relationship like this there are a lot of questions and controversies. Some people argue that there was nothing more to the relationship than employer and employee. But there is a lot more evidence that it was far, far more than that. Lydia stayed with Thaddeus for the rest of his life, until his death in 1868. She was by his bedside when he died. Neighbors referred to her as Mrs. Stevens, and they were considered to be common-law married in their local area.

also public domain

also public domain

Thaddeus and Lydia didn’t have any children together, but they raised Lydia’s two sons as well as Thaddeus’s two nephews together. Thaddeus later legally adopted his nephews. After his death, Lydia inherited a portion of Thaddeus’s estate and continued to live in his house, purchasing it and the adjoining lot.

Given Thaddeus Stevens’s liberal – radical for the time, really – political view and views on racial equality, it’s not a great leap to assume that his relationship with Lydia was marital in every way except legally. Seems pretty obvious to me. I loved that scene towards the end of Lincoln where they climb into bed together like any other old married couple. To me that really underlined the point of the whole 13th Amendment debate and the point of the movie. Look at everything we had to go through for an old man and his wife just to be together. Sometimes history is stupid. It’s a relief when we get it right.

Of course, Thaddeus Stevens wasn’t the only man of his era and earlier who had an interracial relationship. I know it’s a HUGE subject of debate, but I happen to be in the school of thought that says that Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemmings enjoyed a long-term loving relationship. That one’s a little trickier though because she was his slave. And his wife’s half-sister. … I should write a blog post about that relationship someday. It’s fascinating!

Why I Would Have Totally Wanted To Live In The High Middle Ages

WARNING!  The following post is full of personal opinions (based on solid fact and years of research) and blatant historical revisionism!  Read on at your own risk!

So.  Last week I gave you a brief run-down of the High Middle Ages and what made it such a unique period in history.  It was a time of political stability (inasmuch as politics can ever be stable), of economic prosperity, and cultural flowering.  Yes, the same Middle Ages that people are always accusing of being narrow, dark, and barbaric.  Those aren’t the Middle Ages I’m talking about.

No, if I had to move back in time to live somewhere further back than 200 years ago (because let’s face it, if I could go back in time to live I would have chosen to live in late Victorian England), I would have wanted to live in the England of Henry II.

Henry II, Rock Star King

One of these days I’ll tell you all about Henry II and what made him such a freakin’ awesome king.  In a nutshell, he took a kingdom that had been crippled by bitter inter-family war and made it into one of the largest, most respected, and most prosperous kingdoms in all of Europe.  Remember, when Henry II was king at least half of the kingdom he ruled was on what we think of as French soil.  His marriage to Eleanor of Aquitaine, along with producing 10 children and enough drama to fuel several films and books, added the kingdom of Aquitaine to English possessions.But it wasn’t just the vast conquests of England that make me keen on living their during Henry II’s reign.  Henry was focused on making his homeland strong.  This was an era of enlightenment before the Renaissance.  Oxford was officially recognized during Henry’s reign.  Cambridge would be founded 20 years after his death.  Education was being systematized and formalized.  More importantly, it was happening.  This wasn’t an era of mere subsistence.  It was a time when thought and innovation was flourishing.

I might have liked to have been a nun living in an abbey in Henry’s reign.  During this era if a woman wanted to excel at learning, if she wanted to be a great thinker and a doer of great good, she could be that person within the context of the Church.  Remember, this was the era of Hildegard of Bingen, who was considered to be one of the greatest minds of her time.  Kings of nations throughout Europe would write to Hildegard to hear her counsel on everything from faith to matters of state.  They would come to her.

Or maybe I would have wanted to be a craftswoman.  The High Middle Ages was an era of immense productivity in all sorts of crafts.  With a booming economy came a demand for goods.  And it wasn’t just men who made these goods.  In fact, entire industries, like beer-making and spinning, were dominated by women.  What’s more, during this era women were allowed to join certain guilds.  They were also allowed to own their own shops and businesses in many areas.  You could be a woman and still be an entrepreneur and respected member of society.

You could also inherit property.  It wasn’t until the era of the Black Death that inheritance laws were tightened to only allow men to inherit.  During the High Middle Ages, if a man died without a male heir, his wife or daughters could inherit.  In many cased daughters inherited along with sons.  It wasn’t an equal inheritance, mind you, but it was far better than the Early Middle Ages or the Late Middle Ages.  Or the 19th century, for that matter!

In fact, women such as Eleanor of Aquitaine herself inherited entire kingdoms.  Eleanor was a queen in her own right long before she married Henry.  She was so powerful as herself that Louis, the king of France, sought her hand in marriage long before Henry.  She married him too, and a miserable match it was.  The union was later dissolved and once again Eleanor became the most eligible woman in Europe.  So banish the idea that medieval women were helpless pieces of property from your mind right now!

Now, of course, the thing that most people cringe and grimace about when it comes to moving back in time to the Middle Ages is the standard of living.  And I’m not saying that medieval medicine was in any way comparable to modern medicine.  Yes, a third of men died in battle or of battle wounds and a third of women died in childbirth.  But it wasn’t as if there was no medical recourse for anything ever.  And people ate healthier in the High Middle Ages (and had enough to eat, I might add, because it was a prosperous time), they got more exercise as a matter of course, and tobacco hadn’t been discovered yet.

People also tend to complain that life in the Middle Ages was dirty.  Well, I’ve already ranted about that at length in this blog post.  To summarize, cleanliness was, in fact, a major part of medieval life and people did bathe and understand basic hygiene.

All in all, I think it would have been a pretty sweet time to live in.  Life was good, humanity was progressing in all sorts of ways at a faster rate than it had for centuries, and as far as they knew the future looked bright.  So next time you’re tempted to use the term “medieval” to describe something backwards and awful, stop to remember that not all of those Middle Ages were all that bad.