Tag Archive | sexy times

A Taste of Fool for Love … and Jacinta Archer

Fool For Love_blog sizeIt’s release day! I’ve been so busy getting Fool for Love up and available that I haven’t had time to write blog posts. But I did want to give you something. So how about one of my favorite scenes from Fool for Love, which includes one of my absolute favorite side characters ever, Jacinta Archer.

Fans of Jacinta may remember the trouble she caused in Our Little Secrets. Well, good news! She will probably make some kind of an appearance in all of the Montana Romance books because I love her so much. And my dear friend Kristine keeps urging me to write a novella in which she is the heroine. You never know, it could happen!

So here you go, a little slice of Jacinta….

Continue reading

How Dirty Dancing Sparked My Romance Career

A couple of weekends ago, I was down in The Bahamas. It was cold and rainy, so what did I do? I turned on the TV. What should be playing but the final scene of Dirty Dancing. Of course I was riveted (in spite of it being the TV version where they put the credits over all the cool dancing). As I watched with a sigh, I realized that I owe a huge debt of gratitude to Johnny Castle and Baby for inspiring me with a love, no, a longing to write Romance.

Yes, Dirty Dancing is one of the reasons I became a Romance writer.

dirty-dancing-movie-posterDirty Dancing came out in 1987. I was in 7th grade, and I was not allowed to see it. My mom, who was sweet and gentle and conservative and divorced under heartbreaking circumstances (my dad cheated and left us) didn’t want me going anywhere near this reportedly steamy film about an inappropriate relationship. I was a good girl too and I didn’t see it. … Until it came out on video. My mom may have been conservative, but she wasn’t dictatorial. We watched it together.

I remember the scandal of that love scene between Johnny and Baby in Johnny’s cabin. I can still hear my classmates talking about it. “Did you see that??? He kissed her neck!” “And oh my gosh, she touched his butt!” I can still remember the pre-adolescent fascination – delighted or disturbed depending on which classmate you asked – over the sheer sexiness of the whole scene! And I’m not gonna lie. Thirteen year old Merry’s socks were knocked off! I must have watched that scene, the Sylvia & Mickey scene, and every dance scene in the movie about a million times … and we didn’t even own the tape! But believe you me, that was one of the first VHS tapes and then DVDs that I bought.

The funny thing is, by today’s standards that epic love scene – the first I ever remember seeing – is really tame. There’s hardly any skin, there’s no deep-throat snogging, and for the five seconds that you see them in bed there is no realistic forward and backward movement. Today’s thirteen year old girls probably watch it and say “Psht! Whatever!” (which is a whole other kind of problem).

dirty dancing love sceneBut in all honesty, that’s still one of the hottest love scenes on film as far as I’m concerned. The heat and chemistry between those two is amazing. All the nudity and realistic motion and face-sucking is right there in their eyes. As they dance you can see them both smoldering on the inside. Every look sizzles. And she touches his butt! Oh my gosh, does she! Never have two people on screen so obviously wanted to rip each other’s clothes off and do naughty things so blatantly.

THAT is what Romance is all about. Sure, I like the graphic love scenes, both reading and writing them. But what really toasts my crackers is the build-up, the slow burn, the dirty dancing. When you can capture a thousand emotions and a hundred thousand years of human wanting in a single touch, you know you’re in the presence of greatness. It isn’t about the horizontal hokey-pokey, it’s about discovery and instinct, about need and acceptance. It’s about finding your soul-mate.

I have a distinct memory of smiling at the screen as the credits rolled that first time watching Dirty Dancing and happily saying, “And they meet up again wherever they both live and get married and live happily ever after.” To which my mom replied, “I sure hope so,” in ominous undertones.

Of course, that begs the question, Did Johnny Castle and Baby Houseman get married and live happily ever after?

Of course thirteen year old Merry was certain they did. No question. Then I got older and wiser and started to think about it more. Would they? I mean, they come from completely opposite worlds. Could Johnny handle the pressure and perfection of an upper-class life (and let me tell you, he doesn’t look that Jewish to me). Would Baby be content to compromise her dreams to fit Johnny’s into her life? She wants to join the Peace Corp. I would assume Johnny wants to do something with dance. Is there a middle ground to those two things? Jaded late-twenties Merry began to think things wouldn’t turn out so great.

sylvia mickeyIt had actually been years since I’d seen Dirty Dancing when I found myself catching that last scene in the Bahamas. So once I got home I found a copy of the movie and watched it in full again. Yep, still an awesome flick! Still one of my favorites. I know it by heart and can tell you what order the songs will play in. The moves of the dance routines are like comfortable muscle memories from years past.

But what does late-thirties Merry think about Johnny & Baby’s chances?

You know, I think they just might be able to make it. I do! Baby may be super young (eighteen seems like a child to me now), but Johnny wasn’t all that old either. Both of them were bound to go through a lot of changes before they settled on what they really wanted to do with the rest of their lives. I think there is a strong chance that Baby’s dad might just concede that his daughter is a good judge of character and do something to help Johnny get enough of a job doing what he wants to support Baby.

Granted, it was 1963 and they would have gotten married or broken off entirely. But I think there is a strong chance Johnny would have put his dreams on hold to support Baby’s. They would have gone into the Peace Corp together for a while. It would have been good for Johnny to see more of the world and to have a chance to help people even less unfortunate than him. The thing is, you can’t stay in the Peace Corp indefinitely. At some point you have to leave and get another job. That’s when they would have gone back to real life … and opened a dance studio.

See what I mean? All those years ago Dirty Dancing got me thinking like a Romance writer. We’ve definitely got to have a Happily Ever After, but how we get it and where it goes is what the story is all about.

So there you have it. My love of Dirty Dancing will go on and on as long as I can imagine Romance. I’m sure I’m not the only one out there either.

Hot Guys!

You know what they say. “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” And that couldn’t be more true than when it comes to what attracts us in the opposite sex. What one of us sees as a super-hot guy, another will turn her nose up at and say “Eew.” I’m pretty sure that guys have similar reactions to girls. But let’s face it, ladies. We like looking at them just as much as they like looking at us, and we’re just as picky.

However, as a Romance writer, I have a responsibility to my readers to make sure I provide a full spectrum of yum. I love looking at the covers of Romance novels, in all their silly, sexy glory, and I’m continually tickled over what other women think is hot.

Take Bachelor Number One, for example:

Bachelor Number One© Olga Sapegina | Dreamstime.com

Bachelor Number One
© Olga Sapegina | Dreamstime.com

Hot, eh? Nice chest, wicked little glint in his eyes? Think he’s got what it takes?

*shrugs* He’s okay. Not really my type. He’s a little too young for my tastes and he looks like he might be mean to me.

What about Bachelor Number Two:

Bachelor Number Two© Nicku | Dreamstime.com

Bachelor Number Two
© Nicku | Dreamstime.com

Does he get your blood pumping? Want to take him out and see what he can do? Love the bad-boy look?

Me? Eew. No. Not at all. SO not my type. He probably owns a truck or a motorcycle. Yeck! You can keep him!

Alright then, what about Bachelor Number Three:

Bachelor Number Three© Get4net | Dreamstime.com

Bachelor Number Three
© Get4net | Dreamstime.com

Now we’re talking! Smooth, suave, sophisticated. Wearing a suit and a smile, just the way I like them! This guy is totally my type. He looks like he could have a good time and talk about art or academia at the same time. And who knows what other “talents” he has.

But you might think he’s as boring as paint. Maybe you think he’s uptight or that he could have douchey tendencies. To each his own.

How about something completely different, like Bachelor Number Four:

Bachelor Number Four© Aleksandra Alekseeva | Dreamstime.com

Bachelor Number Four
© Aleksandra Alekseeva | Dreamstime.com

Ah! Now there’s a guy who looks like he could have fun AND build a geodesic dome! Maybe he plays the guitar or dreams of helping children in Africa. Maybe he’s your type.

I could probably be friends with this guy, but I wouldn’t date him. I cringe at dreads (sorry Alaina!). But he could be the man of your dreams.

See, that’s the thing about types. We all have a different one. I feel like the Romance world is packed full of Bachelors Number One and Two. Occasionally you find Bachelor Number Three in there. But has anyone ever read a Romance with Bachelor Number Four? Maybe there should be more of them out there. Number Four is definitely someone’s type somewhere. Ah, but does that woman read Romance? Would a book with good old Number Four as the hero sell? I dunno.

So what do you think? Which bachelor above is the biggest eye-candy for you? Who would you love your Romance novel hero to look like?

2013 Book #8 – Welcome to Temptation, by Jennifer Crusie

Ah! Every once in a while a book comes along that makes you say “Yes! That is how I want to write!” For me that book was Welcome to Temptation, by Jennifer Crusie.

Welcome to Temptation

Welcome to Temptation is a Contemporary Romance with some hilarious humor and a touch of mystery/suspense. Oh, and lots of very good sex. What makes it so good? The fact that the heroine, Sophie, is pretty sure she’s never had good sex … until she meets the hero, Phin.

But I’m getting ahead of myself. The novel opens with Sophie and her sister Amy arriving in the quirky nowhere town of Temptation, Ohio to film what is supposed to be a come-back video for washed-up movie-star Clea. Clea used to date their brother Davy and has turned to the sisters to make this video about her going back to her old hometown and meeting up with her old boyfriend Frank. Simple, right?

Oh no. Nothing is ever simple in Temptation. The town is packed with a full spectrum of wacky characters, from the ridiculous to the sublime. It’s also rife with small-town politics. And in charge of it all is the town’s handsome young mayor – and local bookstore owner – Phineas Tucker.

Phin doesn’t particularly want to be mayor, but his father (named Phineas Tucker) was mayor and so was his grandfather (also named – you guessed it – Phineas Tucker), and Tuckers don’t lose elections or anything else. Phin isn’t happy with his life, but when Sophie shows up in town to make a movie he is drawn to her, first out of civic responsibility and curiosity and then out of pure lust.

Of course, things get a little complicated when the comeback video the sisters are shooting turns into a porn starring Clea and her ex-high school boyfriend Frank’s very young son. And then someone turns up dead … and everyone thinks they are the one who killed him.

Yes, this is exactly the kind of book that I want to write! I can’t tell you how many times I laughed out loud while reading it. I love a book that’s full of humor. It wasn’t just the humor of the plot either. There was hilarity in every detail. Crusie knows her characters backwards and forwards and knows exactly how to describe their foibles. She knows small-town life and all of the reasons it is both ridiculous and wonderful. Every scene was believable in every way.

But it’s not just the humor of this story that I’d love to write. The characters were so three-dimensional that I was able to put faces on them, to see the way they moved, and to catch the looks in their eyes, all without boatloads of description. In fact, I don’t remember there being much description beyond what was necessary. You could see the universe these characters were interacting in based on their actions and reactions alone. It was the ultimate in showing over telling.

And the story was sexy as all get-out! But at the same time, the sex itself wasn’t vividly described. There was a lot of it, but it was central to the plot. The sex life of Sophie and Phin related in every way to the personal journey they were each on and was the ideal tool to show the character growth they both experiences. That sounds clinical, but the point is that all of that sex – not to mention the prolific use of the F-word – was essential without being gratuitous, titillating without being crude. I love how Crusie weaved it all into the story without beating me over the head with it.

Yep, there were so many things I liked about this book that I might actually have to go back and read it again someday! Too bad the copy I have was loaned to me by a friend from church. I definitely have to read the sequels and other works by Jennifer Crusie. Her style of storytelling is something I want to study and emulate. In fact, reading Welcome to Temptation might actually change the rather dark Contemporary I was going to start writing soon into something with much more humorous elements. We’ll see!

I’m not entirely sure what’s up next on my reading agenda. I have a novel to beta-read for a friend and a few bits and pieces that I want to take care of. After that, we’ll see. Stay tuned!

Great Romances – Thaddeus and Mrs. Stevens

Okay, I’m writing this before the Oscars, even though it’s going to post the day after, and while I don’t expect Lincoln to win, it’s one of the Best Picture nominated films that I’ve actually seen. (Incidentally, why do they nominate so many films for Best Picture these days? I miss the days when there were just 5 nominees) Anyhow, if you’re like me, a hopeless romantic and history buff, of course the question you were left with at the end of the movie was “Was Thaddeus Stevens really in a relationship with his African American housekeeper?”

And also if you’re like me, you went out and did the research. Here’s what I learned….

Yes. Yes he was.

public domain

public domain

Thaddeus Stevens was an interesting guy. He was born in Vermont in 1792 and was one of four boys. His father was a shoemaker … when he wasn’t drunk and running out on the family. His father died when Thaddeus was young, so essentially he was raised by a single mother in the very early 1800s. All indications are that he worked hard, had a lot of responsibility from an early age, and grew up in poverty. He did attend Dartmouth College and later the University of Vermont, graduating in 1814 and moving to York, Pennsylvania. Yay Pennsylvania! He taught school there until he passed the bar. He then set up a law practice, first in Gettysburg and later in Lancaster. He never married. Probably because….

Lydia Hamilton Smith was born in 1815 to a free African American mother and Irish father. She married Jacob Smith, a free African American, and had two sons with him. When he passed away in 1852 she and her sons moved to Gettysburg, where she took a job as Thaddeus’s housekeeper.

Now, of course with any sort of personal relationship like this there are a lot of questions and controversies. Some people argue that there was nothing more to the relationship than employer and employee. But there is a lot more evidence that it was far, far more than that. Lydia stayed with Thaddeus for the rest of his life, until his death in 1868. She was by his bedside when he died. Neighbors referred to her as Mrs. Stevens, and they were considered to be common-law married in their local area.

also public domain

also public domain

Thaddeus and Lydia didn’t have any children together, but they raised Lydia’s two sons as well as Thaddeus’s two nephews together. Thaddeus later legally adopted his nephews. After his death, Lydia inherited a portion of Thaddeus’s estate and continued to live in his house, purchasing it and the adjoining lot.

Given Thaddeus Stevens’s liberal – radical for the time, really – political view and views on racial equality, it’s not a great leap to assume that his relationship with Lydia was marital in every way except legally. Seems pretty obvious to me. I loved that scene towards the end of Lincoln where they climb into bed together like any other old married couple. To me that really underlined the point of the whole 13th Amendment debate and the point of the movie. Look at everything we had to go through for an old man and his wife just to be together. Sometimes history is stupid. It’s a relief when we get it right.

Of course, Thaddeus Stevens wasn’t the only man of his era and earlier who had an interracial relationship. I know it’s a HUGE subject of debate, but I happen to be in the school of thought that says that Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemmings enjoyed a long-term loving relationship. That one’s a little trickier though because she was his slave. And his wife’s half-sister. … I should write a blog post about that relationship someday. It’s fascinating!