Tag Archives: manorialism

Medieval Monday – Knight and Day

So.  As we discussed last week, there was a 90% chance that you would have been a peasant had you lived in the Middle Ages.  But what if you weren’t?  What if you were one of the lucky few born to a noble family?  Life would have been a wee bit different.  The Middle Ages was the time to be a noble.  Politics, military action, education, fashion, and much of religious life all revolved around the nobles.  Where you were born was as important as who you were born to.  In places like Germany and around Paris, for example, the nobility was strictly limited to a few families.  In other parts of France and England, however, you could marry into the nobility.  But we’re getting a bit ahead of ourselves.

Congratulations!  You’ve been born a noble.  And if you’re lucky enough to have made it past your first year of life without dying or being abandoned you’re doing pretty good.  Wait, wait, what’s that you say?  Abandoned?  Yes.  In the Middle Ages it wasn’t all that uncommon for babies to be abandoned.  If you were a peasant you might abandon your baby because you couldn’t afford to feed them.  But noble babies were abandoned too.  With birth control all but non-existent and the amount of land owned by any given lord finite it wasn’t all that uncommon for a lord with too many heirs to give some of them away to the Church.  In fact, as much as 85% of the men and women in monastic life were given to the Church as infants and children in a practice called oblation.  But we’ll talk about that more when we talk about life in a monastery.  For the sake of argument your parents did not give you away to the Church.

A noble childhood in the Middle Ages wasn’t all that different from 21st century childhood.  You had toys and play time and could run around with your friends being a nuisance to everyone and driving your nursemaid and your parents crazy.  It’s when you got to about eight years old that things changed and the divide between the sexes sprang up.

If you were a boy of noble birth, at age eight you would be packed off to serve in the household of one of your father’s friends or relatives.  Yep, you would go from a life of noble luxury to being a kind of servant in some strange dude’s household.  There you would learn everything you needed to know to become a knight.  This includes how to polish armor and take care of weapons, how to ride and fight, maybe if you were really lucky how to read and write, in Latin, of course, and how to get pushed around by your betters and still obey them and be loyal to them.  This period of hard-knocks apprenticeship would continue until you were 21.  Yeah, not so awesome really.  Sort of like going to a strict, individualized boarding school.  Although the quality of the experience any boy of noble birth had would differ depending on the personality of the lord they were placed with.

At age 21 a boy would become a knight.  All those ceremonies and the myths around them happened at this age.  It was very religious and mystical in nature.  When a young man passed through the process of knighthood and came out on the other side he was a lean, mean fighting machine.  And that’s exactly what he was expected to do.  Fight.  And that’s about it.  He was still considered a ‘youth’ until he was married, but you couldn’t marry without land and you couldn’t get land until you won it or until your father gave it to you.  Which meant that most men didn’t marry until they were in their 30s or 40s.  So what do you do with all that pent up sexual frustration?  You fight.  It was widely believed in the Middle Ages that half the reason the Crusades were started was to ship out an entire generation of randy young noblemen who did nothing but cause trouble fighting and raping and pillaging at home.

A quick side-note:  My family were Swedish nobility.  Oh, I know, you say, Swedish nobility in the Middle Ages were Vikings, right?  Wrong.  The Vikings were the warrior class.  They were the violent, horny young ‘knights’ that couldn’t wait for their fathers to die to get their hands on the land.  The noblemen sent them overseas to rape and pillage places like England because they caused too much trouble at home.  My ancestors stayed home and calmly managed their estates.

Another problem that this system of extended youth for young noblemen caused was a serious age gap not only between noblemen and their wives but between fathers and sons.  I used to wonder why there are so many stories of rebellious sons seeking to kill their fathers, from Henry II of England and his sons who were always at each other’s throats to fathers and sons in folklore and legend.  Well, if there was a 40 year difference between them it’s no wonder they didn’t see eye to eye.  Not to mention the fact that men spent a lot of time away from home … fighting.

Which meant that most manors were run by stay-at-home wives and mothers.

The average age for marriage for girls in the Middle Ages was 16.  Yes, teenagers were routinely married off to guys in their 30s and 40s.  Me, I like older men, but for most young girls this meant a whole lot of eew.  These were not outstanding love matches.  But remember, there were a bunch of young, virile knights running around with nothing to do but seduce young, frustrated wives with old or absent husbands.  The whole system of courtly love grew up around these extramarital affairs.   Peasant life is starting to look good, isn’t it.

Anyhow, if you were a noblewoman you were expected to run the manor.  This meant being the manager for all of the guilds and craftspeople on your land.  You had to be well-versed in the running of businesses and oversee not only the day-to-day running of the manor house, but also the industries within the manor at large.  Not to mention popping out heirs left and right.  No, ladies, being a noblewoman was not all about sitting quietly in the tower working on your tapestries.  Noblewomen were also quite often called on to solve disputes between their husbands and sons.  There may have been huge age gaps between fathers and sons, but quite often the age difference between mothers and children was small.  Many a Medieval man wrote long, loving works of devotion to their mommies.  And yes, at the end of the day when your husband came back from fighting someone, ladies, you would have to turn all the control back over to him with a smile.  Which explains why some widows were fiercely determined never to remarry and were renowned to be as powerful as any man.

The life of a Medieval noble was also ridiculously expensive.  The phrase “He who dies with the most toys wins” could have applied to the Medieval aristocracy.  Stuff meant status.  The higher your social standing the more you needed to keep up appearances by buying horses, clothes, estates, by having huge amounts of servants and ostentatious displays of jewels and finery.  Tournaments and festivals were organized so nobles could show off their stuff to each other.  Could you afford the stuff?  Um, maybe.  If not you might take out loans from the local monastery or some of those wealthy peasants we talked about last week.  You could go bankrupt showing off how wealthy you were.  And what did you do when you ran out of money?  You went off to fight someone.  What better way to refill your coffers than by pillaging your neighbors.  And we’re not talking country-to-country here.  Monarchs were forever having to break up petty squabbles between neighboring lords.

So there you have it.  The life of a noble.  Exciting, flashy, but not so stable or loving.  There’s so much more to it than that though and I’m sure I’ll come back around to talking about it someday.  But there was one other way to live that was neither peasant nor noble but was open to peasant and noble alike.  That was, of course, the Church….

Medieval Monday – A Day in YOUR Life

Good morning, medieval peasant!  Rise and shine!  The sun is rising and it’s time for you to get to work.  You roll out of bed, which you share with your spouse, yawn and stretch, and trudge across the room to wake your three children.  Your house has just one bedroom that everyone shares, but you don’t mind.  It’s a step up from the one-room, windowless house of your grandparents.  Your family enjoys average prosperity so your house has two rooms and a shed out back for the animals (which do NOT live with you in the winter now because you’re not on the very bottom rung of peasantry anymore).  Your cousin, however, has done very well for himself over the years and his house has separate rooms for parents and children, boys and girls, AND it’s two-stories tall!  Someday, you think, someday we’ll be that prosperous too!

You wander out to your main room to fix breakfast: a lovely bit of bread, some cheese, maybe an onion or turnip from your back garden, all washed down with some milk or, of course, ale.  You gotta love that ale!  You drink it with every meal.  You’ve heard a rumor that in the monastery down the road each brother is given an allowance of three gallons of ale a day.  How’s that for monastic life!  With breakfast washed down and lunch of pottage made with cabbage and seasonal vegetables yet to come, you might head out to the fields, whether you’re a man or a woman, or go to work at your trade if you happen to be a carpenter, dyer, weaver, tanner, or something along those lines.  Whatever your father and his father and his father’s father did, that’s what you do.  Or if you are a tradesman but don’t have work at the moment you might look for a job in the fields as a day-laborer.  If you’re a woman you might see if the lord in his manor house needs cleaning or other household work done.  Some people hundreds of years from now might mistakenly call you a servant if you do this, but you and your medieval lord both understand this is a temporary assignment.

Okay, hold on, you say.  How come I’m a peasant?  How do you know that’s what I would be doing if I lived in the Middle Ages?  Hey, I’m just telling you like it is.  In the Middle Ages 90% of the population of Europe were peasants.  Odds were that you would be too.  Medieval Europe was agrarian and local.  Sure, there were cities, but they were few and far between.  Rural life was what it was all about.  Last week I talked about manorialism.  Well here it is.  Manors, the villages and fields surrounding a lord’s estate and administrated by him, were the essence of medieval life.

So let’s get back to what your day would look like.

Contrary to shockingly inaccurate modern belief, your status as peasant didn’t mean you were dirt-poor, dispossessed, and on the verge of being squashed by a lord who owned you, body and soul.  There was as much variation amongst the peasant class as there is in the middle class of the twenty-first century.  Some peasants were pitiful and little more than slaves.  Some were wealthy and loaned their lords or the church cash in hard times.  A lot depended on the region where you lived and the grander economics of the time.  And the weather.  Oh my gosh, the weather decided everything.  Too much or two little rain could set everyone back years.  But for the sake of argument I’m putting you smack in the middle of the peasantry.

So there you are, working in the field, building things, dying things, weaving things, generally being useful and producing the food and goods necessary for survival.  Why are you doing this?  Because Wal-Mart hasn’t been invented yet.  Trade in the Middle Ages was a fraction of what it is today.  It was hard enough to ship goods from one village to another, let alone through big cities and off to exotic foreign locales.  Most peasants rarely ventured more than 25 miles away from their home village in their lifetime.  So everything that you needed to sustain yourself, your family, and your community had to be made locally.

Of course, this wasn’t all that bad.  I’ve made you an average peasant and I’m also putting you in an average village during an average time.  You’ve got enough to eat.  The grains and other staples you grow in the fields are enough to sustain both you and your lord year-round.  The vegetables you grow in your back garden are enough to feed your family.  You can get nuts in the forest next to your fields and fruit seasonally.  In fact, this is what you eat most of the time.  Sure, you have some chickens, a couple of pigs, sheep and maybe some cows.  That wealthy cousin of yours even has a few horses to help with the plowing.  But you save meat for special occasions only, Christmas, Easter, Michaelmas, Candlemas.  The lord might eat meat more frequently, but for all intents and purposes you’re a vegetarian.  You have no idea that this is good for your health.  So is all that exercise you’re getting through work.  In fact, since you made it past childhood you’re pretty damn fit.

You have three children, that’s about average.  Of course there were a couple that died in infancy or early childhood.  That couldn’t be helped.  Either they got sick or there was an accident or they never really were healthy to begin with.  It happens.  It’s sad, but common.  Even healthy adults die before their time in your world.  I mean, married women spend an awful lot of time pregnant and still have to work while in that state.  Childbirth is always risky.  Men have their dangers too.  When there’s nothing to do but drink in the winter after everything is harvested but planting hasn’t begun yet it’s amazing how many silly accidents happen.  You had a brother who was in his cups when he wandered out into the woods in the dead of winter and was found frozen and mauled the next day.  Not that uncommon really.  Same with pub brawls and on the job accidents.  Must be all that ale.

Plus there are opportunities for bettering yourself.  You can work hard and save up, passing your wealth down to your children, for example.  But you could also send your children off to a nearby monastery.  A generation or so back your ancestors saved up enough to buy their way out of serfdom.  Happens all the time.  Or if you’re really ambitious and up for a little adventure you could join the intrepid groups who are draining the fens, cutting down forests, or reclaiming marshland to build new settlements.  Colonists aren’t just a post-1492 invention, you know.

So there you have it.  That’s what your life would have looked like in the Middle Ages.  It really isn’t a bad life after all.  You’ve got your family around you and you know you can depend on them in times of crisis.  You are fiercely loyal to and identified with your village community.  You know your place in the world, something not many of your twenty-first century brethren can necessarily say.  Life is simple but satisfying for the most part.

“What about your life, Merry?  Are you down here working in the fields with us?”  Nope.  Not me!  Because my family, the Gyllenhaals, were nobility.  We can trace our family tree back to 788!  So no, I wouldn’t have been a peasant.  I would have been a land-owning noble.

But more about that next week….

Medieval Monday – The Truth About Feudalism

Twice this week I found myself in a conversation about the Middle Ages where I ended up defending the entire era against accusations that it was a miserable, barbaric, oppressive time period.  Grr!  If you’ve picked up on anything at all from reading my Medieval Monday posts then you know that nothing gets my goat faster than exactly those sorts of false assumptions.  What raised my hackles even more was when one of the other parties in these conversations asked, “Where are you getting this information from?”  *insert look of incredulity here*  They’re called books.  Some are commonly referred to as primary source material.  I had to read a lot of them when I earned my two bachelor’s degrees in History.  What interests me more is where these people who insist that the Middle Ages was dark, ignorant, and unfair got their information.  I’m worried their answer would be “it’s common knowledge”.  Friends, no knowledge is common.  It all comes from somewhere.  In the case of all this misinformation about the Middle Ages I blame the Victorians with their post-industrial, the-sun-never-sets-on-the-British-Empire sense of superiority.  With a little bit of the American spirit of independence as the root of everything good thrown in.  Because of course the enterprising spirit of the individual and the nationalistic impetus to convert everything to OUR way of doing things is far superior to the Feudal System, right?

Funny thing about that Feudal System.  Because the thing is, in a lot of ways it worked.  Really well.

Okay, I’m going to describe this in as over-simplified, generic terms as possible, because in reality there were so many different factors to Feudal Society and so many variations from country to country and manor to manor that moving from one specific set of organizational rules to another would be like moving from one planet to another.  But in a nutshell….

The term “Feudalism” is used to describe a series of duties and obligations within a hierarchy, usually military.  A lord is granted a parcel of land and in return for that land he must provide the king with military service or a cash payment to cover the costs of hiring a mercenary to take his place.  The king, in return, prevents the collection of his lords and their land, also known as vassals, from getting the crap kicked out of them by their neighbors and having their land confiscated by slathering barbarian hoards (sometimes referred to as the French).  The second half of this system is more correctly referred to as the Manorial System.  The lord parceled out his land to folks known as peasants or villeins or serfs.  They work a portion of the land for themselves as their own and in turn owe the lord labor on his land or a cash payment to cover the cost of hiring workers.  The lord has a responsibility to make sure laws are upheld, public buildings (which he technically owns) like mills, ovens, and wine-presses, are maintained.  It was totally a “you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours” system.

Here’s where it gets sketchy.  Depending on who your lord was (and in as much as 1/3 of manors it was the church) and what the economy was doing at the time, things were easier or harder.  There were a lot of ifs.  In a bad time serfs had very few freedoms, they didn’t own their own land or their own houses, they couldn’t marry without their lord’s consent, they definitely couldn’t move or abandon their land or choose their own profession, and they had to pay fees for the use of the lord’s mills, etc.  This was made extra sucky if you had a rat’s-ass as your lord.  He had the legal right to make your life miserable.  These are the kind of manors that give the rest of the Middle Ages a bad name.

But it wasn’t always as bad as this. ^^

So what did the good times look like?  A LOT different.

A manor was divided into three types of land.  The Demense was owned directly by the lord and worked exclusively for his benefit.  The Dependent land was still technically owned by the lord but had the appearance of belonging to the peasants that had an obligation to provide the lord with service or cash.  The third bit was the Free Peasant Land.  Yeah, you heard me, Free Peasant Land.  The proportion of these sorts of land varied from place to place, manor to manor, and so did the obligations that the peasants owed to their lord.  It was worked in the “Open-field System”, which I’m sure I’ll have a lot to say about later.  When life was good and things were going really well the size of the Demense was smaller and the peasants had plenty of time to work their own land.  As a result they had plenty of cash to pay to their lord in the form of rent.  And they had the money to pay the fees to leave or start some other trade.  Everyone had enough and law and order was maintained.  Some regions were known for their peasants having more freedoms depending on the regional specialties in farming or livestock and some areas were famous for having a lot of free peasants.  Some centuries saw economic booms and a greater abundance of liquid assets and other centuries ran into hard times, like famines, plagues, and wars, and peasants lost some of their freedoms to balance the budget, so to speak.  Plenty of manors were peaceful homes to fat, happy peasants who got along with their lords and they all lived happily ever after.  But this is boring.  That’s why you don’t hear about it in the same vivid detail as the horrible rotten manors where everyone was miserable.

But wait, you continue to frown, those poor peasants are still subject to the whims of a lord who was put in charge of them for no reason other than that he happened to be born a noble.  Yeah, but before you go getting all upset about the rights of individualism and self-determination and fall back into the same old game of bemoaning the Middle Ages as a cesspool of inequality and hardship and throwing tea into the harbor to protest taxation without representation, let’s make a little comparison.  I work in corporate America.  I am a cube-dweller, a corporate peasant.  I have my own cube decorated with all of my own things, but in fact I don’t own that space.  And I spend all day working for someone else.  My boss, a Vice President, tells me what to do.  I do it or I’ll lose my job.  She, in turn, does what her boss, the owner of the company, tells her to do.  Is it fair that the owner of my company has a house in the Bahamas where he spends half the year while I get paid just barely enough to keep a roof over my head and food in my cats’ bellies?  Well, in a way yeah, it is fair.  He worked long and hard to build the company and really he’s a good boss.  We have excellent benefits.  I paid $100 for a $6000 visit to the emergency room two years ago.  I am in no hurry to quit this job.  Same thing, I believe, with a Medieval manor.  If I was a peasant living under a good, honest lord I don’t think I’d mind working for him as long as he kept me from starving or being robbed or invaded by Vikings.  … Except that the Vikings were my ancestors.  But that’s another story.

Yep, there are a lot of things about the modern world that are just as “unfair” or “inequitable” or “unjust” as some people may think the Feudal or Manorial systems were.  But there are a lot of benefits that we fail to recognize as well.  Life on a good manor could have been a very happy place to live, what with its sense of community and camaraderie.  But more about that next week.