Tag Archive | harry potter

Fan Fiction: Where to Draw the Line?

Fan fiction.  It’s been on my mind a lot lately.  It’s been on a lot of people’s minds.  I just got the October issue of Writer’s Digest and there’s an entire article in there about fan fiction, what it is, who writes it, and if it’s worth anything.  I have a lot of opinions on that last one there.  Apparently my good friend and fellow writer Samantha Warren does too since she posted about originality in writing just yesterday as I was writing this post.  As Sam states, there are no original ideas.

Enter fan fiction.

Of course “fanfic” has been in the news and in people’s thoughts so much this summer because of Fifty Shades of GreyFifty Shades is self-confessed Twlight fanfic, recycled and cleaned up into something that has nothing to do with vampires.  I’ve heard a lot of criticism about E.L. James writing this way.  A lot of writers have balked at the idea that someone is making millions off of something that blatantly has its origins in someone else’s work.

Let me be honest right from the start.  I don’t really have room to talk when it comes to criticizing E.L. James.  An Amazon reviewer scathingly accused my debut novel, The Loyal Heart, of being Robin Hood fan fic.  I would be lying if I denied it wholesale.  The Robin Hood legend was a strong inspiration for my novel.  I take issue with that reviewer saying I ripped off a specific BBC tv version of the legend in its entirety, because I didn’t.  But I did glean inspiration from a lot of other things, movies, stories, actors, and history.  Because like Samantha Warren says, there are no original ideas.

So when I read the Writer’s Digest article about fanfic I had to smile a lot.  Why?  Because the author of that article, in a respectable writing publication, I might add, supports the entire concept of fan fiction.  And so do I.  I also thought it was incredibly interesting that she pointed out that the very first fan fiction piece ever was Virgil’s Aeneid, which took a minor character from Homer’s work and made him into the hero of his own story.  Awesome!  Those of us who have been known to dabble in fan fiction are in the presence of greatness.

I actually posted about this sometime last year.  I think I mentioned then that the concept of fan fiction has been around for a while.  In the early 20th century there were thriving fan fiction communities, some of which contained writers who were famous in their own right, like L.M. Montgomery, who wrote Sherlock Holmes fanfic and Oz fanfic.  The Writer’s Digest article also points out that a lot of Shakespeare’s work could be considered fan fiction as he more or less rewrote the work of writers who pre-dated him.

In fact, it wasn’t until the 19th century that originality in art of any kind was championed at all.  Up until then the greatest writers were those who could rewrite old stories the most eloquently while staying true to the original work.  Think I’m the only one to rework the Robin Hood legend?  Have you looked at the bulk of late medieval and early renaissance literature?  It’s all Robin Hood and King Arthur recycled in every way imaginable.  Because that was what people wanted to read.  Originality was seen as hubris.

Okay, but now we’re in the 21st century and originality is where it’s at.  Or is it?  How many copies have the Fifty Shades books sold at this point?  How many hits to fanfic sites like fanfiction.net get on a daily basis?  People read fan fiction because the like to see the same characters over and over.  They don’t like originality as much as we want to think they do.  That’s why every successful movie franchise ever has a slew of sequels.  I’m still surprised we haven’t seen Titanic 2.  But they did re-release it, didn’t they.

Here’s the catch.  I don’t have a problem with fan fiction.  I agree with the Writer’s Digest article that describes it as a fantastic way to practice working with pre-defined characters and worlds to learn consistency and plotting in a way that stays true to the original material.  Fan fiction is training wheels, it’s like practicing scales on the piano.  But should it be published?  Actually, I don’t think it should.  Shared, yes.  Published, not so much.

Okay, is that hypocritical of me to say considering accusations about The Loyal Heart?  I really don’t think so.  Because my intent was not to copy but to riff on an ancient legend.  Well, that and to tell the story with the true history of the time period, which most people don’t know and wouldn’t believe if you told them (King Richard was a murderous jerk who hated England and didn’t speak English and Prince John was legally responsible for administrating half of the country and did a good job of it too).  And in spite of criticism I adamantly believe that my characters are my own.

What about E.L. James?  Does she believe that her characters are her own?  Was she trying to create something new using familiar themes or was she attempting to exploit prefabricated characters to placate the public’s thirst for more of the familiar and to make a profit?  I honestly don’t know.  And I’m not interested in making that judgment.  I’m also not interested in reading her books because frankly, BDSM skeeves me out a bit (says the Romance writer).

I will stand behind fan fiction though.  In my days of writing I have written fan fiction of Indiana Jones, Wuthering Heights, Star Trek, Labyrinth, Days of Our Lives, Dr. Quinn: Medicine Woman, The Wheel of Time, and most recently Harry Potter.  I’ve got two different Harry Potter fanfics, actually, one that follows George Weasley after the fact and one that follows Draco Malfoy (as he leaves the wizarding world in shame and tries to live life as a Muggle).  Would I ever think of publishing any of it?  Not on your life!  Would I let you read it if you asked?  Maybe if you asked nicely.  None of it is finished anyhow.  Do I have fun with it?  You bet I do!  Has it helped the rest of my writing?  Yes it has.

So wherever you fall in the fanfic debate, just remember that it’s been going on almost as long as there has been writing.  In fact, I would venture to say that the first people to ever write down a story were not writing their own creation but their version of someone else’s story.  Yes, fan fiction is our heritage.  Embrace it.  But profit from it?  Exploit it?  Never.

That being said, where do we draw the line?  What falls on the side of “there are no original ideas” and what is copyright infringement?  What do you think?

Great Romances – Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger

A couple of weeks ago one of my Facebook friends posted an article about the ten most disappointing or least inspiring sci-fi couples ever.  One of the couples on that list was Harry Potter and Ginny Weasley.  I wish I could find that article again (believe me, I’ve tried) but the gist of their argument was that there was no spark between the two.

Of course, the article even said that the problem was the lack of chemistry between the actors who portrayed the characters in the movie version and that if you read the book the Harry/Ginny romance is a lot more interesting.  I wholeheartedly agree with this.  In fact, I was going to write about that Harry/Ginny romance, but then I realized I would be missing the point if I did.  Because the truly great romance of the Harry Potter books is Ron and Hermione.

What makes Ron and Hermione such a great couple is the fact that they have known each other since they were kids.  They met on the Hogwart’s Express only moments after Harry and Ron met.  And of course neither was particularly impressed from the get-go.  But against the odds they became friends.

Another thing that makes Ron and Hermione such an awesome couple is that they kick butt together.  This is not a relationship where one is the hero and the other is the sidekick.  They are both sidekicks, which gives them a degree of equality that, frankly, you just don’t see in a lot of romances, even in our modern world.  They each brought something unique to the table in their efforts to help Harry defeat Voldemort.  Throughout the series they took turns being more or less prominent in Harry’s world, but as far as I can tell one never overpowered the other.  It is a partnership of equals.

And yet those equal things are not the same things.  Ron isn’t as smart as Hermione, but I personally think Hermione doesn’t have the heart that Ron has.  And to me it’s sort of brilliant that in this pairing it is the boy who is the heart and the girl who is the head.  How’s that for turning stereotypes on their heads?

They’re also brilliant as a couple because there is and has always been so much fire between them.  They bickered from the get-go.  And as everyone knows, bickering is a sign of something much deeper waiting to burst out.  Of course these two kids, with their confusing hormones popping and their unfamiliar new adult feelings wrapping them up in knots, would take out that energy on each other.  Rowling presented the budding romance like someone who understands adolescence all too well.

I also happen to think that Ron and Hermione are a perfect example of opposites attracting.  They have different approaches to life and problems.  And yet they end up in the same place eventually because in their deepest cores they are far more alike than unalike.  They are yin and yang.

For a second I thought they were going to go there!

I will concede that the relationship is much more vivid and alive in the books than it was in the movies.  Frankly, Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson had some seriously good chemistry and if you’re just watching the films of course you’re going to want Harry and Hermione to get together.  But that has nothing to do with the characters and everything to do with the actors portraying them.  And as we all know, the movie is never as good as the book.  In the book it’s Ron and Hermione all the way.

So way what you will about Harry and Ginny, who I also happen to think are brilliant together, when it comes down to it, Ron and Hermione are the great lovers of the Harry Potter series.

P.S. Why are there so many bizarre HP pairings (and resultant porn) all over the internet???

Unlikely Hero of the Week – Matthew Lewis/Neville Longbottom

To understand the full impact of this week’s Unlikely Hero of the Week we must first cast ourselves backwards in time.  Take yourself back to this….

Aw.  Cute little pudgy, nerdy, hopeless Neville Longbottom.  In the Harry Potter books he walked the fine line of being a loser.  The only thing he seemed any good at was Herbology.  When I saw the first Harry Potter film all those years ago I thought Matthew Lewis was perfectly cast as the dorky, pathetic, but still lovable Neville.

Fast forward to today….

Oh my gosh, if there was ever an award for winning puberty this boy should get it!  HOLY COW!  Neville Longbottom grew up to be a total hottie!

And he also kicks butt in a cardigan.  Honestly, I think this was my favorite part of the Deathly Hallows II movie.  It was an awesome moment in the books and Matthew Lewis nailed it in the film.  Perhaps the best casting coup in the history of film.  I mean, how could the casting director have known in the year 2000 that J.K. Rowling would make the dopey Neville into such a hero by the end of the saga, and how could they have known that that pasty, round kid would grow up to personify the hero?

I mean, seriously!  Let’s take a look at this side-by-side.

Uncanny.  And perfect.

I also think that Tom Felton’s not doing too bad these days, but I always suspected he would turn into a hottie someday.   The whole Harry Potter made it through puberty with flying colors.

It all just reminds me of a universal truth.  A truth I learned in my own life too.  There was a boy in my class in school, Greg, who was always a short, scrawny, nerdy kid who none of the girls ever looked twice at.  I specifically remember the girls in our class at dances whispering and dreading him asking them to dance.  Then BAM!  He grew up and was suddenly incredibly attractive.  He teaches 8th grade now and I have it on very good authority that all of the middle school girls think he’s totally dreamy.  So girls, never write off the dorky boy.  Neville Longbottom happens!

Book Review – Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

It dawned on me the other day that I haven’t done a book review post for my blog in weeks.  This makes me sad.  It makes me sad for a couple of reasons.  One, I want to review books on my blog and I haven’t been doing that.  Two, the reason why I haven’t been reviewing books in spite of having read a few in the last few weeks is because my Mom always told me if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all.  I refuse to give a fellow Writer, especially a fellow Indie Writer, a bad review.  So I haven’t been able to review those books I’ve read.  I wish it wasn’t so.

So what’s a girl to do?  I’ve been reading truly terrible Indie Pubbed romance novels and I’ve been rereading the Harry Potter series.  For the six thousandth time.  Yes, I got a Kindle for my birthday in July and the first books I loaded onto it were the Harry Potter books … the hard copies of which I had sitting five feet away from me at the time that I downloaded them.  But let’s face it, the Harry Potter books are genius.  So I figured, why not give one a review?

Here goes….

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

This is the middle book in the Harry Potter series.  It was the latest book to be published when I first started reading the series.  I gobbled up one, two, and three one right after the other, almost as if they were one book.  Then I read Goblet of Fire.  My first reaction?  WHOA.  The first three were kids books.  With Goblet of Fire stuff suddenly got serious.  I mean, a student dies.  It’s violent.  It’s raw.  Best of all, the third side of the triangle of opposing forces in the series begins to emerge.

But let’s back up a bit.

One of the things I loved so much about Sorcerer’s Stone was getting to know the world J.K. Rowling had created.  In fact, I would argue that the entire first book of the series is one giant world-building exercise with an “Oh yeah, and this is the plot that is going to extend through the entire series” thrown in at the end.  Goblet of Fire starts out with the Quidditch World Cup.  I freakin’ LOVE everything having to do with that bit.  Yes, there’s a little bit of plottage there, but there’s a lot of world-expansion to.  Suddenly we have an extensive series of chapters that takes place outside of Hogwarts.  It entertains just as it sets up what is to come.

From a writer’s perspective, the book is very nicely structured.  Part One: build-up to the Triwizard Tournament.  Part Two: the Triwizard Tournament.  Part Three: Guess Who’s Back In Town.  I personally have a thing for novels that are structured like a tv series season.  What I love about this book is how every three or four chapters fits smoothly together like a tv series with hooks and cliff-hangers leading from one episode to the next.  The first episode, for example.  The Quidditch World Cup is the meat of the episode, but there’s a hook for the next episode, something fun is going to happen at Hogwarts, and a cliff-hanger to end it, OMG, look at that Dark Mark up in the sky, does this mean Voldemort is coming back?  Rowling does this in all of her books and I think that’s what makes them so brilliant.  Episodic content is the anti-sag for the middle of books.

Another thing that has me worshiping at the altar of J.K. Rowling is that no chapter, no paragraph, no word, no detail is wasted.  She throws in hints and clues in every section of dialog, in every description of action and every detail.  But when you’re reading it through the first time you don’t even notice.  Take Rita Skeeter for example.  I didn’t pick up on any of the bug references scattered throughout the book the first time I read it until Hermione figures out the mystery at the end.  But when you read it the second time knowing what you know, it’s all there.  The craft involved in weaving such a tight story, nothing wasted but with the appearance of casual detail, is awesome in the truest sense of the word.  Not to mention that the titles are the shortest and most effective synopses I’ve ever seen.

It’s ironic to me that, from what I hear, this is Rowling’s least favorite book of the series.  I read somewhere that it annoys her because the publishers rushed her to get it out and she wasn’t able to make it everything she wanted it to be.  I can only imagine what it would have been if she had had the time to create everything she wanted to!  To my mind Goblet of Fire is a perfect transition between children’s book fantasy and dark coming-of-age tale.  They say that in a trilogy the second, middle book should be the darkest one.  Well folks, the darkness starts here.  Although personally I think that Order of the Phoenix is the darkest of the books … and my favorite one … aside from Deathly Hallows.  The overwhelming feeling as you read the last few pages of Goblet of Fire is “oh shit”.

What a great way to end a book and a book review!  Say what you want about YA, fantasy, or overly-hyped media extravaganzas, if you’re a Writer and you haven’t read the Harry Potter books yet you’re missing out on a brilliant example of craftsmanship.  And if you’re someone who enjoys a good story and you haven’t read the Harry Potter books yet you’re just missing out.  Don’t let the hype fool you!  These books have all that hype for a reason!